In
a contemporary natural society, population increase often occurs when birth rate
is higher than death rate (Williams, et al.
2011). Whereas the population growth rate of individual economies relies
mostly on natural increase of population and migration, global growth figures
are exclusively based on the natural increase of population. The world
experienced rapid population explosion during the late 19th and 20th
centuries. The aforementioned was relatively because death rates associated
with individual countries gradually decreased. During this period, developing
economies were not left behind as more modern medicines were dispatched after
the World War II. In quite a number of the third world countries, the rapid
death rate decline preceded low birth levels that stretched for over 25 years.
Therefore, the declining death rate levels together with increased birth rates
resulted into rapid population increase to up to four percent per year. Since
the year 1960s, global birth rates have experienced a rapid decline in a number
of developing states. However, Sub-Saharan Africa and the Middle East are yet
to contain their birth rate figures. The high birthrates witnessed in both the sub-Saharan
Africa and the Middle-East is a replica of high rates witnessed in the United
States and Europe in the 19th century. In the 21st
century, least developed economies i.e. those with a big number of their
populace living below a dollar a day are still characterized by high levels of
birthrates globally. This is so despite women producing fewer children as
compared with their predecessors. The reasons behind these low fertility rates
are often intertwined with the economic growth and development of a country. In
a rational society, parents often choose to have leaner families when health states
of their countries improve. Improved health conditions give them an assurance
that their babies will enjoy good health. In addition, improved health
conditions tend to minimize dependence levels between parents and their
children. The aforementioned implies that parents do not have to bank on their
children to provide for them in old age (Ewert
2012).
Improved health conditions and other
transformations in the society have driven more parents to appreciate the need
to have their girl children acquire basic education. Education of the girl
child has largely lowed fertility rates. According to Vincenzi, Satterthwaite and Mangel (2012), schooled women often
tend to advocate for leaner families and are accredited for producing health
children. Education has also opened a number of avenues to women. In the contemporary society, quite a number
of women have an access to increased work opportunities i.e. outside home, so
they often start families later in their carrier. Women who start families at
the dwindling moments of their production tend to produce few children .This is
relatively because their time is often shared between careers and kid
upbringing. Despite work opportunities dictating the number of kids one can
produce, the advanced levels of family planning kits together with the ease to
access them has played a cardinal role in controlling the number of child
production. In addition, it has assisted parents in spacing their children (Buckingham and Turner 2008).
No comments:
Post a Comment